full image - Repost: Has anyone looked into Qubic's UPoW model as a post-Merge GPU mining alternative? Genuinely curious about the economics (from Reddit.com, Has anyone looked into Qubic's UPoW model as a post-Merge GPU mining alternative? Genuinely curious about the economics)
Mining:
Exchanges:
Donations:
Been doing research on what to run on GPU hardware post-Merge and Qubic keeps coming up as something worth understanding.The basic claim: instead of your GPU running arbitrary hash calculations that serve no purpose beyond consensus, Qubic's Useful Proof of Work routes the compute toward AI training tasks. The network was apparently verified at 15.52M TPS by CertiK on live mainnet, which is either impressive or irrelevant depending on how much you trust TPS benchmarks.What caught my attention from a GPU mining perspective: the hardware profile. RandomX (Monero) is the closest comparison in terms of what the compute is actually doing - CPU/GPU intensive, ASIC-resistant by design. Qubic's AI training tasks seem to be in a similar compute category.The economics question I can't find a clean answer to: what does the per-GPU daily yield actually look like compared to Monero at current difficulty? I've found their calculator at qubic.org/mining (http://qubic.org/mining) but I'd rather hear from people who have actually run it than rely on first-party numbers.Has anyone here actually contributed GPU compute to Qubic and can give real numbers? Hashrate, power draw, daily output - the actual data rather than projections.
Social Media Icons